December 2, 2008


For your amusement, our Definition For A New World Order: INEXPLAINISM.

When we encounter the unexplained, we sometimes abandon explanation and embrace exploring. Then we can embrace and endure inexplication. It is not so much that we tolerate the admissibility of the inexplicable. We need only suspend the inadmissibility of contradiction.

We admit, welcome, enfold and cherish the possibility and practice of (not)explaining. Could you inexplain that, please, Mr. Professor sir?  We offer… Inexplication as Method. As Doctrine. Maybe we are the Inexplainists. We offer, for your consideration, Post-Explainism, an -ism with an -ist to call it’s own.

-Definitions for a New World Order:, 2008

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment